Culture

NSW Premier Distances Himself From Those NSW Premier-Approved “Stoner Sloth” Ads

Stoner Sloth is the mascot for bureaucratic incompetency.

Want more Junkee in your life? Sign up to our newsletter, and follow us on Instagram and Facebook so you always know where to find us.

Ever since news broke that the NSW government spent actual money trying to dissuade youths from smoking pot by depicting a universally-adored creature trying to navigate teenage life while absolutely blazed, “Stoner Sloth” became the mascot for bureaucratic incompetency. Not only is the campaign comically awful and totally off-the-mark, but it also shares a name with an online store that sells weed, and every stoner’s spirit animal.

In the past 24 hours, the ads, which came from the NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, have been relentlessly ridiculed by international media, the entire internet, cannabis research groups, commemorative t-shirts — and even the NSW Premier himself.

Tweeting last night, Mike Baird claimed he had only just seen the clips, and called them “quite something”; which is weird, because he is quite literally the most authoritative person involved.

Obviously, Twitter sledged the living hell out of him.

He also briefly gave comedy a test-drive.

And then retreated back into his broken shell of a neoconservative dad.

But as insane as it sounds, a statement released by the department confirmed there was genuine thought and strategy behind the ads.

“The ‘stoner sloth’ public awareness campaign has been designed to encourage positive behaviours in young people before bad habits start, and motivate discontinued use of cannabis before they become dependent,” it said.

“The campaign is designed to appeal to, and be ‘shareable’ among, teenagers who are some of the most vulnerable to cannabis use.”

Mission accomplished, I guess.

Professor Copeland of the National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre — who want their name disassociated with the ads — agrees the campaign is ‘sharable’, but doubts it’s for the intended reasons.

“Using this kind of character is… likely to have an effect other than those that were intended,” Copeland said.

“Associating a sloth with people being intoxicated may convey a positive appeal to people being intoxicated rather than the intended negative message.”